Wednesday, August 13, 2008

To Hull And Back



Hull could easily stage the Bullitt remake

As we may have mentioned before, one of the junior Tylers went to Hull University, so Tyler has been there a number of times.

We all know Hull - outright winner of Britain's Crappest Town award, butt of a million cruel jokes, and scratching a jobless joyless life in the grim shadow of Prescott Towers. And yet, as we drove in over Harold Wislon's ginormous white elephant Humber Bridge, Tyler wasn't thinking death and decay at all. He was thinking City by the Bay.

Yeah, of course, Hull is never going to have Californian weather. But it does have San Francisco's fantastic waterfront location, even including a spectacular bridge. And it does face out to the world, especially those massive European markets.

So how come it isn't a booming city of the future?

The collapse of the fishing industry? Less than ideal obviously, but SF faced the same, and it managed to develop replacement industries. Why's Hull been so crap?

Communications? Well, yes, the dual carriageway link between the Bridge and the A1 southbound has never been finished (hence the white elephant tag). But even without that link, Hull is still coupled up to the motorway network.

Well, could it be lack of government support?

Ah yes, government support.

As we blogged here, for 50 years British taxpayers have pumped billions into places like Hull, all in the name of regeneration. And it has been a complete and utter flop. The money has gone in all right, but the regeneration has never materialised.

So what to do? Over the last week, we have had two reports making radical suggestions.

First, the TPA reported on Labour's Regional Devlopment Agencies (RDAs). They've spent £15bn of our cash since 1999 and achieved SFA (other than a few more thousand well paid quangocrat jobs). As the TPA demonstrates, all those billions have failed to lift regional growth rates (they've actually fallen), failed to lift regional employment, and failed to close the gap between the leaders and the laggards.

The TPA's suggestion?

"Abolish the Regional Development Agencies [which] would have no negative impact on the regions, given the RDAs' failure since 1999. Their 2009-10 budget of £2.19 billion could then be used to pay for a 4p cut in the Small Business Rate of Corporation Tax - from 22 per cent to 18 per cent. Reducing tax on small businesses would create new jobs, boost existing businesses, make life easier for people starting business and give the regions an economic leg-up: exactly what the RDAs were meant to do and have failed to achieve."

Excellent idea.

Then today, Policy Exchange came back with its second report on urban regeneration policy (see this blog on its first report). They show that just as with the money spent on RDAs, the money spent on urban regeneration is a massive waste. Worse, under Labour, this spending has gone through the roof:


Why's it gone up so much? Yes, that's right:

"For the last decade British politics has been dominated by ministers who represent poorer urban areas. Of the current Cabinet – Jack Straw represents Blackburn; David Miliband South Shields, Tyne and Wear; Jacqui Smith Redditch; Harriet Harman Camberwell and Peckham; Hazel Blears Salford; Andrew Burnham Leigh; Hilary Benn Leeds Central; Alan Johnson Hull West and Hessle; Ed Balls Normanton, West Yorkshire; and Yvette Cooper Pontefract and Castleford. Inevitably they are committed to urban regeneration and it should come as no surprise that spending on urban renewal has increased in the last few years."



It stinks, and taxpayers should be screaming foul. Especially when they see what little good the cash has done in recipient areas, where it's achieved virtually nothing other than the demolition of many fine Victorian houses, and the building of a few arts centres entirely unwanted by the vast majority of the local population (see previous blog).

So what does Policy Exchange suggest?

Well, sadly, they've gone bonkers. They decided to grab headlines by suggesting we should close down the North altogether. They want all those Northerners moved down South, say to Guildford, where they propose building 10,000 new houses... yes, 10,000 right nextdoor to the Major!!! gah, splutter, nimby, chum, nimby. No wonder Dave has described the report as "insane" (we've always had doubts about Portillista Policy Exchange - eg see here - but until now we'd presumed they were fully onside with Dave - clearly we were wrong).

It's a shame. Because lurking in the report's 63 pages, there are some sensible ideas. In particular, they suggest taking all the money currently spent on these useless top-down regeneration programmes, and giving it to the local authorities directly to spend as they wish - including local council tax cuts.

Now that's more like it. As we've said many times, we desperately need fiscal decentralisation. Divvying up the urban regeneration budget doesn't get us all the way to where we need to be, but it would be a significant move in the right direction.

And think what it could do for Hull. If the city council could get its hands on the cash poured into Labour's top-down regeneration and development programmes, then it would have some real say over its own affairs. Imagine. Imagine further it was allowed to escape the crippling effects of national minimum wage rates and the over-regulation of business. Imagine it could set its own business and council tax rates. Imagine it could choose to cut local public spending to fund tax cuts. What might happen then?

Business taxes could be slashed. Business would look at Hull in a whole different way. Suddenly it's profitable for existing businesses to expand, and new businesses to move in/start up. Maybe not Silicon Valley, and certainly not a magic bullet. But suddenly Hull's destiny is back in its own hands.

And remember something else: location does matter. As the ever excellent John Kay argues here, in economic development terms, geography matters a lot. And while Policy Exchange may reckon Hull's geography is a burdensome leftover from our industrial past, it's actually a huge advantage. Because Hull isn't in the back of beyond - it's well under 200 miles away from Europe's most dynamic growth region. How much better placed it is than the bombed out industrial cities of Eastern Europe.

I promise you, Hull is blessed. And you should use the property crash to snaffle some of the new waterfront apartments they're building. Trust me.

Update Last night Kirsty had Prezza on Newsnight. Well, not "had", perhaps... we wouldn't want to see that... chatted amiably to is more like it. The subject was this Policy Exchange report, and as you'd expect, she allowed the blubberman free rein to lash out at the evil Tories. But we did think she might register some flicker of objection to his ludicrous assertions about the success of his abysmal regional policies (slammed by virtually everyone who's ever looked at them seriously, including the NAO). For example, on Hull, he revealed that he'd given the city £1bn of our money, and the place is transformed - "the skyline is full of cranes... people are moving back into the city centre... etc". What he didn't mention was that since 1997 Hull's GDP per head has fallen even further relative to the UK average (see ONS data here). Needless to say, Kirsty didn't mention it either.

1 comment:

  1. Bạn đang tìm nơi giao hang nhanh. Bạn là chủ shop online và đang cần nơi có dịch vụ giao hàng tận nhà cho shop online. Để bạn có thể nhờ gửi hàng cho khách của bạn.
    Ngoài ra bạn còn có thể cần đến dịch vụ giao hàng thu tiền hộ. Vì có 1 số khách củ bạn thích lựa chọn dịch vụ giao hàng tận nơi rồi thu tiền. Vì khách hàng theo thói quen thấy hàng mới trả tiền.
    Nên đây chính là dịch vụ được rất nhiều khách hàng sử dụng. Ngoài ra chúng tôi còn tìm đối tác vận chuyển để phát triển trở thành liên minh vận chuyển lớn mạnh nhất Việt Nam.

    ReplyDelete